cal/tests/libs/__mocks__/prisma.ts

61 lines
2.0 KiB
TypeScript

import { PrismockClient } from "prismock";
import { beforeEach, vi } from "vitest";
import logger from "@calcom/lib/logger";
import * as selects from "@calcom/prisma/selects";
vi.mock("@calcom/prisma", () => ({
default: prisma,
prisma,
...selects,
}));
const handlePrismockBugs = () => {
const __updateBooking = prismock.booking.update;
const __findManyWebhook = prismock.webhook.findMany;
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
prismock.booking.update = (...rest: any[]) => {
// There is a bug in prismock where it considers `createMany` and `create` itself to have the data directly
// In booking flows, we encounter such scenario, so let's fix that here directly till it's fixed in prismock
if (rest[0].data.references?.createMany) {
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
rest[0].data.references.createMany = rest[0].data.references?.createMany.data;
logger.silly("Fixed Prismock bug");
}
if (rest[0].data.references?.create) {
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
rest[0].data.references.create = rest[0].data.references?.create.data;
logger.silly("Fixed Prismock bug-1");
}
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
return __updateBooking(...rest);
};
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
prismock.webhook.findMany = (...rest: any[]) => {
// There is some bug in prismock where it can't handle complex where clauses
if (rest[0].where?.OR && rest[0].where.AND) {
rest[0].where = undefined;
logger.silly("Fixed Prismock bug-2");
}
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
return __findManyWebhook(...rest);
};
};
beforeEach(() => {
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
prismock.reset();
handlePrismockBugs();
});
const prismock = new PrismockClient();
const prisma = prismock;
export default prisma;